Gueudet, G., Buteau, C., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., & Sacristán, A. (2020). Programming as an artefact: What do we learn about university students’ activity?Proceedings of INDRUM 2020 Third Conference of the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics, Bizerte (Tunisia), March 2020.
Buteau, C., Gueudet, G., Dreise, K., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., & Sacristán, A. (2020). A student’s complex structure of schemes development for authentic programming-based mathematical investigation projects.Proceedings of INDRUM 2020 Third Conference of the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics, Bizerte (Tunisia), March 2020.
Mgombelo, J., Forbes, W., Buteau, C., Muller, E., & Sacristán, A. (2020). Students’ Ways of Thinking in Computer-Based Mathematics Investigation Projects. Presentation at the 14th International Congress for Mathematics Education (ICME), Shanghai (China), July 2020.
Buteau, C., Muller, E., Gueudet, G., Mgombelo, J., & Sacristán, A. (2020). Researching the teaching and learning of programming for university mathematical investigation projects. Presentation at the 14th International Congress for Mathematics Education (ICME), Shanghai (China), July 2020.
Buteau, C., Gueudet, G., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., & Sacristán, A. (2019). Instrumentation de la programmation pour l’investigation mathématique. 51e Colloque du Groupe de didactique des mathématiques du Québec (GDM), Université Laval, Ste-Foy (Canada), May 2019.
Buteau, C., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., & Sacristán, A.I. (2019). Stages of students’ instrumental genesis of programming for mathematical investigations. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien & P. Vale (Eds), Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 4, p. 127). Pretoria, South Africa: PME.
Marshall, N. & C. Buteau (2014). Learning by designing and experimenting with interactive, dynamic mathematics exploratory objects.International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 21 (2), 49-64.
Gueudet, G., Misfeld, M., Mesa, V., & C. Buteau (2014): Technologies, resources and instruments in university mathematics education. Research of Mathematics Education, Special Issue: Institutional, sociocultural and discursive approaches to research in university mathematics education, 16 (2), 139-155.
Muller, E., & C. Buteau (2012). An Innovative Integration of Evolving Technologies in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. In Essays on Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 2, Akis, V. (Ed.), Athens Institute for Education and Research (publisher), 117-122.
Mamolo, A., Buteau, C., & Muller, E. (forth.). Prospective mathematics and sciences teachers’ views on coding and computational thinking.American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON, April 2019.
Broley, L., Buteau, C., & Muller, E. (2017). (Legitimate peripheral) computational thinking in mathematics.Proceedings of the Congress of European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME), Dublin (Ireland), February 2017.
Buteau, C. & Muller, E. (forth.). Systemic integration of programming in undergraduate mathematics: from implementation to theory.International Congress on Mathematical Education 2016, Hamburg (Germany).
Buteau, (2016). Undergraduates Learning of Programming for Simulation and Investigation of Mathematics Concepts and Real-World Modelling. Online proceedings of Didactics of Mathematics in Higher Education as a Scientific Discipline, Hanover (Germany), December 2015.
Buteau, C., Marshall, N., & Muller, E. (2014). Learning university mathematics by creating and using fourteen ‘microworlds’. In G. Futschek & C. Kynigos (Eds.), Constructionism and Creativity. Proceedings of the 3rd International Constructionism Conference 2014 (pp. 401-406). Vienna, Austria: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (OCG).
Buteau, C., Marshall, N., & Muller, E. (2014). Perception on the Nature of Core University Mathematics Microworld-Based Courses. In G. Futschek & C. Kynigos (Eds.), Constructionism and Creativity. Proceedings of the 3rd International Constructionism Conference 2014 (pp. 379-389). Vienna, Austria: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (OCG).
Buteau, C., Muller, E., & Marshall, N. (2014). Competencies Developed by University Students in Microworld-type Core Mathematics Courses. In Proceedings of Joint Meeting Int. Group Psychology Mathematics Education (PME 38), Vancouver, Canada, 2014, pp. 209-18.
Marshall, N., Buteau, C. & E. Muller (2013): Exploratory Objects and Microworlds in University Mathematics Education. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching, Bari (Italy), 187-193.
Muller, E., & C.Buteau (2012). An Innovative Integration of Evolving Technologies in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. In Essays on Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 2, Akis, V. (Ed.), Athens Institute for Education and Research (publisher), 117-122.
Buteau, C. & Muller, E. (2006). Evolving technologies integrated into undergraduate mathematics education. In L. H. Son, N. Sinclair, J. B. Lagrange, & C. Hoyles (Eds.), Proceedings for the Seventeenth ICMI Study Conference: Digital Technologies and Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Revisiting the Terrain, Hanoi University of Technology, 3rd-8th December, 2006, Hanoi (Vietnam) (c42)[CD-ROM], 8 pp.
Related Literature
Abrahamson, D., Berland, M., Shapiro, B., Unterman, J., & Wilensky, U. (2004). Leveraging epistemological diversity through computer-based argumentation in the domain of probability. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(3), 19-45.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245-274.
Assude, T. (2007). Teachers’ practices and degree of ICT integration. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. N. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1339-1348). Larnaka, Cyprus: Department of Education, University of Cyprus.
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education: Implications for policy and practice. EU Science Hub. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/printpdf/175911
Cook, L. S., Smagorinsky, P., Fry, P. G., Konopak, B., & Moore, C. (2002). Problems in developing a constructivist approach to teaching: One teacher’s transition from teacher preparation to teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 102(5), 389-413.
Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in mathematics, 75(2), 213-234.
Feurzeig, W., & Lukas, G. (1972). LOGO—A programming language for teaching mathematics. Educational Technology, 12(3), 39-46.
Goos, M., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2010). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), ICMI Study 17, technology revisited, ICMI study series (pp. 311-328). New York, NY: Springer.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. doi:10.3102/0013189X12463051
Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments. The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195-227.
Hoadley, C. (2012). What is a community of practice and how can we support it? In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd Ed.)(287-300) New York: Routledge.
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Leron, U., & Dubinsky, E. (1995). An abstract algebra story. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(3), 227-242.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers (Vol. 17). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionisn. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-12). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Papert, S. (1971). Teaching children to be mathematicians vs. teaching about mathematics. Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 249. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5837
Papert, S. (1980a). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1980b). Computer-based microworlds as incubators for powerful ideas. In R. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 203–210). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Rabardel, P. (1995/2002). Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitives des instruments contemporains. Paris, France: Armand Colin.
Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Handheld technology for mathematics education: Flashback into the future. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 667-681. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0269-2
Trouche, L. (2004). Managing complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281-307. doi:10.1007/s10758- 004-3468-5
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal for Science Education and Technology, 25, 127-147.
Wilensky, U. (1995). Paradox, programming and learning probability. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(2), 231-280.
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1881), 3717-3725.